Who What Where When Why ICE

 

Ice Flower

Glacier

The following is research surrounding the BIG  WHY… since the other questions are answered enough simply on reading my Bio and Header to this blog.

There is a reason why ICE has cropped up so often in the News … namely with the death of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, butt we now need to turn our thoughts to where the inner twin world are directing… in typical cryptic fashion— to another form of ICE that poses an even bigger danger that we (as in both our worlds) are faced with.  This danger has left the inner twin world with no choice butt to wage war against us in order to ensure that the “wright”  individuals get on board (to begin with anyway).  

As most are now aware, weather pattern have changed drastically, some of which are natural, butt there is the new man made interference that could change things unexpectedly.  In other words we can’t rely on things happening as they have in the past as we proceed to enter yet another glacial period… if indeed this will be what happens, after all, our interference (man made global warming) has set us on  path of ending our present day Ice Age altogether.   Either way, there are issues we need to consider in order to ascertain the level of danger— what scientists refer to as “Isostatic Adjustment” that can take on many forms as you will come to learn by examining the research below, as well as research material that is yet to be discovered.  Only by examining all, will we be able to determine the best recourse/action.  One thing that’s for certain— we need to prepare if we want to help millions survive who would otherwise perish.

My question (in bold), followed by AI’s response:  

Were winds more severe and faster during the beginning stage of glacial periods that then drove moisture from south to north hence increasing snow fall and growth to glaciers

Yes, scientific evidence indicates that during the early stages of glacial periods, winds were often more severe and faster, which, combined with specific atmospheric circulation patterns, drove significant moisture from lower latitudes (south) to higher latitudes (north), accelerating glacier growth through increased snowfall

.  

Here are the key details regarding this process: 

• Intensified Circulation & Faster Winds: As the climate cooled, the temperature gradient between the equator and the poles increased. This intensified atmospheric circulation, creating faster and more severe winds (e.g., meridional flow).
• Moisture Transport (South to North): Enhanced atmospheric circulation and eddies facilitated the movement of moisture from lower, warmer latitudes to high-latitude regions. This increased humidity was crucial for bringing snow to the Arctic, rather than just cold air.
• Rapid Glacial Inception: These changes in climate, including increased snowfall and wind-driven accumulation (preferential deposition), occurred very rapidly, sometimes within decades.
• Role of Wind in Snow Accumulation: Winds did not just transport moisture; they also physically redistributed snow, with lower wind speeds in the lee of mountain ranges or in depressions allowing for greater snow accumulation.
• Resulting Glacier Growth: This increased snowfall on already cold landmasses allowed for rapid accumulation, leading to the rapid growth of ice sheets in the Northern Hemisphere. 

My next question (in bold), followed by AI’s response: 

Is present day Isostatic adjustment as a result of the last glacial period causing shorelines in Nova Scotia to fall into the ocean?

Yes, present-day isostatic adjustment — specifically subsidence (sinking) of the Earth's crust—is a major, ongoing factor causing relative sea levels to rise and shorelines to fall into the ocean in Nova Scotia.

This phenomenon is a long-term consequence of the last glacial period (the Ice Age).

The Mechanism: Post-Glacial "Teeter-Totter" 

• Ice Weight Depression: During the last ice age, a massive ice sheet (Laurentide Ice Sheet) pressed down on the Earth’s crust in northern Canada.
• The Peripheral Bulge: To balance that weight, the crust around the edge of the ice—including Nova Scotia and the Atlantic Provinces—rose up, forming a "peripheral bulge".
• The Rebound/Subsidence: When the ice melted, the land under the ice (e.g., Hudson Bay) began to rise (rebound). Consequently, the land that was pushed up (Nova Scotia) is now sinking, or subsiding, back down.
• Result: The land is sinking at a rate of roughly 10–15 cm per century, creating a "double blow" when combined with global sea-level rise.

Impact on Nova Scotia Shore Lines

• Net Submergence: The combined effect of land sinking and global ocean water rising is resulting in a net submergence rate of roughly 2.5–4.5 mm per year (up to 45 cm per 100 years).
• Rapid Coastal Erosion: The subsidence accelerates the rate of coastal erosion, causing cliffs to fail, beaches to retreat, and shorelines to fall into the ocean.
• Coastal Risk: This, combined with more severe storms and rising sea levels due to climate change, makes Nova Scotia one of the most vulnerable areas in Canada to coastal flooding and land loss. 

Essentially, Nova Scotia is on the sinking side of a geological teeter-totter,, making it experience some of the highest relative sea-level rise in the country.

My next question and AI Answer: 

is present day Isostatic adjustment as a result of the last glacial period causing much land along shorelines in the northern hemisphere to fall?

Yes, present-day 

Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA), or post-glacial rebound, is causing significant land movement along Northern Hemisphere shorelines, but it acts as a "see-saw" effect—causing some areas to rise while others fall. While regions directly under the former ice sheets are rising, the peripheral areas—specifically along the eastern seaboard of the United States and parts of Northern Europe—are experiencing subsidence (sinking).

Key Aspects of Current GIA Impacts:

• Subsiding (Falling) Land: As the massive ice sheets melted, the land that was directly under them began to rise (rebound). Simultaneously, a "forebulge"—a ridge of land that was pushed up around the edge of the ice sheets—is now collapsing and sinking.U.S. East Coast: The Atlantic coast, from the Northeast down to the Chesapeake Bay and Florida, is sinking as this forebulge collapses.
• Southern North Sea/UK: The southern half of Great Britain and the Baltic states are subsiding as the north (Scotland/Scandinavia) rises.
• Rising Land (Emergence): Areas that were under the heaviest ice, such as Hudson Bay in Canada and the Gulf of Bothnia in Scandinavia, are still rising by as much as 1 cm/year. In these areas, the coast is actually emerging, and relative sea level is falling.
• Combined Effect with Climate Change: While GIA is a natural geological process, its effect of lowering land (subsidence) on the U.S. East Coast compounds the threat of rising sea levels caused by anthropogenic climate change.

My next question and AI response: 

when you depress a shallow bowl shaped popper toy without turning it completely inside out what will be the effect

• No “Pop": To make a popper jump, it must be turned completely inside out. This creates a "snap-through buckling" event where the stored elastic potential energy is released.
• Reduced Potential Energy: A shallow depression creates very little internal tension. Therefore, the toy will likely just sit on the surface, or revert to its original shape very slowly without producing the high-velocity, audible jump.
• Stability: If the popper is not inverted to the point where the material stretches/compresses significantly, the partial depression will remain stable, or simply snap back to its original shape, depending on the stiffness of the material

In short, turning the popper partially inside out is just a slight indentation; you must go all the way to trigger the "snap" needed for the toy to fly

So the question then becomes, how extreme did the glaciers at maximum distort the plates laying beneath it?  If the edges of the plates were affected— as in “raised”, then the “snap through” could be in the process at this very moment.  One way to determine if the edges of the affected plates were raised, is if there is evidence of an ancient civilization (like Aztec) buried far below the sea at the plate edge.  Indeed, there is potential evidence of just that, check out this excerpt from Wikipedia article: 

The Cuban underwater formation is a site thought to be a submerged granite structural complex off the coast of the Guanahacabibes Peninsula in the Pinar del Río Province of Cuba.

Sonar images interpreted as being symmetrical and geometric stone structures resembling an urban complex were first recorded in early 2001 covering an area of 2 square kilometres (200 ha) at depths of between 600 metres (2,000 ft) and 750 metres (2,460 ft).^[1][4] The discovery was reported by Paulina Zelitsky, a marine engineer, and her husband Paul Weinzweig, owners of a Canadian company called Advanced Digital Communications,^[5] working on an exploration and survey mission in conjunction with the Cuban government. The team returned to the site a second time with an underwater remotely operated vehicle that filmed sonar images interpreted as various pyramids and circular structures made out of massive, smooth blocks of stone that resembled hewn granite. Zelitsky said, "It's a really wonderful structure which really looks like it could have been a large urban centre. However, it would be totally irresponsible to say what it was before we have evidence."^[1] 

 So why isn’t this worth exploring?!  Perhaps if there is remanence of a sunken civilization far below the sea, that it in turn would alarm experts as to WHY’s … and of course panic could ensue…OR… and I rather this one— humanity then makes a massive joint effort toward a survival solution for the millions in the danger zones.   

I just now joined a conversation on the potential “sunken city” off the coast of Cuba (see screen shot of my input below)

See below screenshots concerning the above info that I copied from: