Many of my posts make reference to "rebound", which is short for:
The image that you see at left came from the Post Glacial Rebound Wikipedia page. It proposes a "theory": that the area in blue is land that's rising, which I agree with, and it further hypothesizes that the yellow-red area is land that's falling, and this is where I disagree.
The yellow-red areas on the North American Plate, had been covered in glacial ice during the last glacial period, and even though not as high as what accumulated further north (the blue sections), it would have depressed the land because the incredible weight melded the snow together into a "sheet" of ice. The image at right, comes from Wikipedia's - the Last Glacial Maximum. The area in grey shows the extent of the Glaciers during the previous glacial period and so verifying what I say. As you can also see, glaciers also occurred in Eurasia and Antartica.
Using the hollow rubber ball example that I used in a recent post, we can understand our present day situation better. If you press a finger tip into the ball it will depress in that area, however, put a
quarter under the same finger and press again, the quarter then disperses the pressure to its outer edge.
The geological/scientific term used to describe our current Ice Age is the Quaternary glaciation.
Scientists estimate that it began 2.58 million years ago and that it occurs in100,000 year cycles that , include an 80,000 year glacial period followed by an 20,000 year interglacial period (approximate). As for the main reason for this Ice Age, note from the Quartenary glaciation wiki page:
The glacial periods come about as a result of sea temperature rising to just the right degree. The water was the right temperature as the earth entered its present day Ice Age and first glacial period. What ends the glacial periods after 80,000 years, is from my opinion, is caused by a sudden an earth shattering event-- Ice accumulating to the point that the weight pushes through the earths crust where it is weakest. The resulting flash explosion from ice/water hitting lava would have literally shook the earth and shattered the glaciers while sending spumes of steam into the air. A massive melt would have ensued. From this began the first interglacial period, one that lasted approximately 20,000 years. This cycle came to an end as the land at the outer rim of the Norther American Plates that had not been covered by the glaciers, land that is under water. The very edge of these plates that are re settling, are rubbing against its neighbouring plate, causing friction that in turn generates heat. In the same way that the rebound occurs more rapidly as time goes on, the plate edges resettling at a faster rate as well, causes friction and inevitably, hotter water. And when it becomes hot enough, it kickstarts the next glacial period.
Earth is experiencing rising water temperatures as we sit. And the temperature will continue to rise until it brings on the next glacial period. The greater snow fall takes longer to melt, and the longer the snow remains, the more sunlight is reflected into outer space and so cooling the planet. This cooling causes glaciers to grow even faster. In the meantime, sea water still evaporates due to friction as the rim of the tectonic plate's beneath the ocean begin to "bowl upward once again as glacial weight increases, not to mention added heat generated from newly opened vents spewing lava into the sea. A hotter sea equates to more evaporation and in turn more salt that's left behind-- salt is heavier than water and so does not evaporate, it sinks, and it's this sinking that propels the great conveyor belt of currents that much faster. The currents in turn generate wind: more hurricanes and blizzards...and more snow than we can even begin to imagine. Now grant you, snow in the farther north does not melt as fast as snow in the more southern reaches of the Plate, hence it is true that the glacial ice in the far north would have been more and heavier. So, not entirely flat like the quarter used in the example, it would have taken on a curved shape both top and bottom, somewhat like a magnifying glass. Regardless of its shape, it formed a solid mass and so pressure would still be dispersed to the glaciers outer limit. For instance, Canada's province of Nova Scotia, where I live, had been covered by the glacier, and so had been depressed, not as much as the farther North, butt this means that it's positioned to rebound and not the other way around.
Much of the information you/I have been given is nothing more than an elaborate lie.
Recently I came to a web site called Earthquake Facts, and to the following info:
Now I come to the inner twin world. It makes sense to me, knowing how they work, that they would have influenced the lives of notable persons who work in "earthquake" related fields. So this brings us to the Earthquake wiki page and to the Seismologist's who made important inroads. My investigation led me to about 7 notable Seismologists, butt these three share something in common:
Checking out each wiki page for birth/death dates, one stands out:
- Post Glacial Rebound the rise of land masses that were depressed by the huge weight of ice sheets during the last glacial period, through a process known as isostatic depression
The image that you see at left came from the Post Glacial Rebound Wikipedia page. It proposes a "theory": that the area in blue is land that's rising, which I agree with, and it further hypothesizes that the yellow-red area is land that's falling, and this is where I disagree.
The yellow-red areas on the North American Plate, had been covered in glacial ice during the last glacial period, and even though not as high as what accumulated further north (the blue sections), it would have depressed the land because the incredible weight melded the snow together into a "sheet" of ice. The image at right, comes from Wikipedia's - the Last Glacial Maximum. The area in grey shows the extent of the Glaciers during the previous glacial period and so verifying what I say. As you can also see, glaciers also occurred in Eurasia and Antartica. Using the hollow rubber ball example that I used in a recent post, we can understand our present day situation better. If you press a finger tip into the ball it will depress in that area, however, put a
quarter under the same finger and press again, the quarter then disperses the pressure to its outer edge.
The geological/scientific term used to describe our current Ice Age is the Quaternary glaciation.
Scientists estimate that it began 2.58 million years ago and that it occurs in100,000 year cycles that , include an 80,000 year glacial period followed by an 20,000 year interglacial period (approximate). As for the main reason for this Ice Age, note from the Quartenary glaciation wiki page:
Isthmus of Panama developed at a convergent plate margin about 3 million years ago, and further separated oceanic circulation, closing the last strait, outside of the polar regions, that had connected thePacific and Atlantic oceans.A strip of land had slowly risen up from the sea and joining North and South America together. This strip of land diverts currents that once circumvented the globe, now driven Northward and bringing with it moisture laden winds that fell as snow in the northern hemisphere. Although the 'experts' list other possible causes, this is without question, the main one. And the last time I looked, the Isthmus of Panama is still there. This means the cycle will continue, and as for global warming, this will bring it on with that much more ferocity. I don't hear any warnings and I don't hear about preparations that need to be taken, without which will leave those living along the coastal regions of South Atlantic US vulnerable, because it's the land there that was free of ice, that will sink exponentially in a final force equivalent to the "pop" that will happen in the far North-- a reverse pop being a "bob" (as mentioned in my recent April 27 post, Winston Hill RIIP: Wade, Bob and More Row ).
The glacial periods come about as a result of sea temperature rising to just the right degree. The water was the right temperature as the earth entered its present day Ice Age and first glacial period. What ends the glacial periods after 80,000 years, is from my opinion, is caused by a sudden an earth shattering event-- Ice accumulating to the point that the weight pushes through the earths crust where it is weakest. The resulting flash explosion from ice/water hitting lava would have literally shook the earth and shattered the glaciers while sending spumes of steam into the air. A massive melt would have ensued. From this began the first interglacial period, one that lasted approximately 20,000 years. This cycle came to an end as the land at the outer rim of the Norther American Plates that had not been covered by the glaciers, land that is under water. The very edge of these plates that are re settling, are rubbing against its neighbouring plate, causing friction that in turn generates heat. In the same way that the rebound occurs more rapidly as time goes on, the plate edges resettling at a faster rate as well, causes friction and inevitably, hotter water. And when it becomes hot enough, it kickstarts the next glacial period.
Earth is experiencing rising water temperatures as we sit. And the temperature will continue to rise until it brings on the next glacial period. The greater snow fall takes longer to melt, and the longer the snow remains, the more sunlight is reflected into outer space and so cooling the planet. This cooling causes glaciers to grow even faster. In the meantime, sea water still evaporates due to friction as the rim of the tectonic plate's beneath the ocean begin to "bowl upward once again as glacial weight increases, not to mention added heat generated from newly opened vents spewing lava into the sea. A hotter sea equates to more evaporation and in turn more salt that's left behind-- salt is heavier than water and so does not evaporate, it sinks, and it's this sinking that propels the great conveyor belt of currents that much faster. The currents in turn generate wind: more hurricanes and blizzards...and more snow than we can even begin to imagine. Now grant you, snow in the farther north does not melt as fast as snow in the more southern reaches of the Plate, hence it is true that the glacial ice in the far north would have been more and heavier. So, not entirely flat like the quarter used in the example, it would have taken on a curved shape both top and bottom, somewhat like a magnifying glass. Regardless of its shape, it formed a solid mass and so pressure would still be dispersed to the glaciers outer limit. For instance, Canada's province of Nova Scotia, where I live, had been covered by the glacier, and so had been depressed, not as much as the farther North, butt this means that it's positioned to rebound and not the other way around.
Much of the information you/I have been given is nothing more than an elaborate lie.
Recently I came to a web site called Earthquake Facts, and to the following info:
It makes sense. A rebounding of the earths plates are quakes that for the most part have been low on the Richter scale, so low and continuous that those of us living in the areas don't feel the activity. This rebounding no doubt triggers bigger earthquakes elsewhere. The earths crust as with any curved flexible object that had been depressed, will rebound when the pressure is released. The rebounding begins slowly with ever increasing momentum as time goes on, and as long as nothing intervenes (like the onset of the next glacial period) the rebound will simply continue to its final "pop".Even a small plate movement can trigger major earthquakes
Now I come to the inner twin world. It makes sense to me, knowing how they work, that they would have influenced the lives of notable persons who work in "earthquake" related fields. So this brings us to the Earthquake wiki page and to the Seismologist's who made important inroads. My investigation led me to about 7 notable Seismologists, butt these three share something in common:
- John Milne (30 December 1850 – 31 July 1913[1])
- Charles Francis Richter( April 26, 1900 – September 30, 1985)
- Michele Stefano de Rossi (30 October 1834 - 23 October 1898)
Today being April 30th makes the dates highlighted in green, meaningful, AND then the birthdays of Milne and de Rossi together with Richter's date of death generates a "September 30, October 30, _____, December 30/ 30th Day Sequence" pattern-cluster. This is a typical pattern-cluster generated by the inner twin world via their slight of hand activity-- their profound ability to influence our outer thoughts and actions without our being the slightest bit aware. This type of clusters is designed to prompt us into bridging the gap-- investigating the wiki page of November 30th. Because the list of Notable Events, Births and Deaths are long, we're generally expected to investigate the years having 3 identical numbers at the end. There were a small handful, with one standing out above the rest:
I decided to investigate the "C Major" wiki page, note the following excerpt:
Note this next excerpt from Donald Scott Smith's wiki page:
The twin '88 in the year is a heads up, and the band name "Dangerous" another. Note from the wiki pages of the two mentioned:
Michael Jackson's death and the related pattern-cluster event leading up to it, is why I started this blog that focuses mainly on the "timely" deaths of notable persons.
MacLeod's date of death is also meaningful -- April 25th, given that Richter's birthday (see above) was April 26, only 4 days ago.Taking this as a prompt, I went back through my posts, note the following title of my recent April 26 post: Vladimir Yulygin and Rudolf Wessely RIIIIP : less lie good win. Definitely, they are at work!!
Now going back to the wiki page of Seismolgist John Milne's note this excerpt:
His year of birth being a twin '55 is one heads up. Note from his wiki page:
- 2000 – Scott Smith, Canadian bass player (Loverboy) (b. 1955)
His date of birth is one off from Valentines Day, and so an addition to the "Off By One" pattern-cluster, this is another typical cluster, designed to communicate that we are "off track", and in this case because Valentines day is about "love", we're off track in so far as love goes. And that's interesting considered he's renown for playing in the ban "Loverboy". So note this next excerpt:
- Donald Scott Smith (13 February 1955 – 30 November 2000)
On November 30, 2000, he was sailing his boat, the 11-metre (36.09 foot) Sea Major,[5] with two friends off the coast of San Francisco near the Golden Gate Bridge, when a freak 8-metre (26.25 foot) wave swept him overboard in shark-infested waters.This is very telling, note the name of his boat "Sea Major" is a play on the name of the music note "C Major", which I talked about in my post, Elias Demetracopoulos RIIP (Part 2): See Sea Sling. As I explained, the inner twin world designed "See", "Sea" and "C" to be phonetically identical in order to generate a cryptic phrase re: "See the C in the Sea". The "C" strategically designed to be the graphic image of a giant cresting wave, so "See the giant wave in the sea"!!
I decided to investigate the "C Major" wiki page, note the following excerpt:
Another lead, note from Haydn's wiki page:
- Twenty of Joseph Haydn's 104 symphonies are in C major
Considering John Milne's death (see above) is July 31, we now have a "March 31, May 31, July 31/ 31st Day Sequence" pattern-cluster (April and June have 30 days). A perfect sequence of 3!!
Note this next excerpt from Donald Scott Smith's wiki page:
- After Loverboy disbanded in 1988, Smith was part of the band Dangerous, along with Mike Reno andBrian MacLeod.
The twin '88 in the year is a heads up, and the band name "Dangerous" another. Note from the wiki pages of the two mentioned:
All three of the dates are meaningful. January 8th is the birthday of my step son and so an addition to the "Targeting Family Birthdays" pattern-cluster. June MacLeod's date of birth and death generates an "April 25, ___, June 25/ 25th Day Sequence" pattern- cluster. And June 25th is particularly meaningful given the following:
- Mike Reno (born Joseph Michael Rynoski; January 8, 1955)
- Brian Oliver MacLeod (June 25, 1952 – April 25, 1992)
Michael Jackson died on June 25th, and this death is meaningful because his "timely" death is the focus of the very first post in this blog:
- Michael Jackson - (August 29, 1958 – June 25, 2009)
Michael Jackson's death and the related pattern-cluster event leading up to it, is why I started this blog that focuses mainly on the "timely" deaths of notable persons.
MacLeod's date of death is also meaningful -- April 25th, given that Richter's birthday (see above) was April 26, only 4 days ago.Taking this as a prompt, I went back through my posts, note the following title of my recent April 26 post: Vladimir Yulygin and Rudolf Wessely RIIIIP : less lie good win. Definitely, they are at work!!
Now going back to the wiki page of Seismolgist John Milne's note this excerpt:
He had won the prestigious Lyell Medal, AND, the name Lyell has a cryptic phrase within: "lie Elle", this is another typical English/French combination that translates into "her lie". The "her" is a reference to the inner twin world who consider themselves as "matriarchal" in complimentary opposite fashion to our "patriarchal" outer twin world. So there is a definite "Lie Theme" pattern-cluster in the works.
On going to the Lyell Medal's wiki page, I found the following:
On going to the Lyell Medal's wiki page, I found the following:
is named after Charles Lyell.Now note from Lyell's wiki page:
Sir Charles Lyell, 1st Baronet, FRS (14 November 1797 – 22 February 1875)His date of death is an addition to the "Targeting Family Birthdays" pattern-cluster given that February 22nd is my grandson's birthday. Yes, this is what it looks like-- they have influenced my life and those surrounding me in a profound way... and that is why I'm here 'wrighting' this post and this blog to begin with. Note from Lyell's wiki page:
Checking out each wiki page for birth/death dates, one stands out:
Patten Roderick Impey Murchison (22 February 1792[2] – 22 October 1871)There is one other thing to consider about February 22nd. When my grandson turns 8, the date will be 2/22/22.
No comments:
Post a Comment