The following stats from Wikipedia's Death in 2013 site has just come to my attention:
It's also meaningful that the day in each case is the 11th... given the inner twin world's propensity for generating "Twin Number" pattern-clusters. They are definitely trying to say something by this... butt what?! We need to examine the evidence.
The 11 can represent the cryptic image of two towers, and because the number 1 shares the same key on my computer keyboard with the exclamation mark "!", then this no doubt factors in to the overall communication. Essentially the number 1 is identical to the capital letter "I", and in fact, the Roman numeral for one uses the letter "I"... with Roman Numeral XI being eleven. In fact 11 can be equated then with II... which I use often in RIIP (a cryptic way of conveying the fact that we are double "I"'s in birth as we are in death). It's also interesting to note that the exclamation mark is nearly identical to an upside down small letter "i"!, and that the letter "I" is also a word, note the etymology:
So then why the singling out of the months July and May?! Of course May is meaningful because it's also my name... butt what of July?! Except that July is also a name... short for "Julius". Since Julius was a man and I'm a woman, it could be that the inner twin world are trying to draw attention to this. Note the etymology http://www.behindthename.com/name/julius:
If you go to the site where I retrieved the etymology of the name Julius, there's also a bust of Julius Caesar... AND notice his audd head, in fact I posted about his audd head once before. The upper left side of Julius' head protrudes outward far more than his right side. So the question is why the difference... well, like different colour eyes tend to bee evidence of tetragametic chimerism, the same is true with Julius' audd shaped head... essentially one side belongs to one twin and the other side belongs to the other. Butt getting back to the "downy beard"... what could the inner twin world bee trying to convey?
The beard covers the chin of males. The most notable difference between the chin of males vs the chin of females from my perspective, is that men tend to have "cleft chins" more than women. In fact, my son developed a cleft chin, butt only as a man... he didn't have one as a teenager... at least it was not very noticeable. This brings me to "natural selection", and I want you now to consider this scenario: During emergence of Tetragametic Chimerism in humans one of the main benefits would have been a "second brain"... certainly the saying holds true "two heads are better than one". This explains our hominid ship to a bigger head-- due to the merging of two brains and nott simply one bigger brain as is the common belief. This would have posed a major problem for the ancient peoples when this mutation first cropped up, given that bigger heads meant harder child birthing... to this day in third world countries, as many as one in three women die from childbirth... that means this mutation is still relatively new. Even with this threat, the "dual" brain offered a better means of survival, butt if people didn't see this at first, only seeing that women were dying in droves because of it, they would have battled against it. They did so by regarding bigger heads as an undesirable trait, and so men and women selected mates accordingly, hence, if you sported a cleft chin, you were virtually unwanted as a mate. Since women don't grow beards a cleft chin would be noticed and she would suffer the consequence of being shunned by potential mates, and since adolescent males acquired a "downy beard" to cover any evidence of a cleft chin emerging, they were immune. This form of "natural selection" process caused the propensity for a cleft chin to remain more hard wired in males vs females. The cleft chin is residual evidence left behind of a merger of laterally conjoined twins (at least with the head).
Note the etymology of "eleven":
Garment and Gray are already recognizable as words... and put together, you get "gray garment", and note how Veneracion sounds like "veneration":
Note the various etymology of the surname Monteith, the first re http://surnames.behindthename.com/names/search.php?nmd=n&terms=monteith:
Leonard Garment (May 11, 1924 – July 13, 2013) Cory Monteith (May 11, 1982 – July 13, 2013)Garment and Monteith were born on the same day and died on the same day
Richard Gray (July 11, 1931 – July 8, 2013)Andrea Veneracion (July 11, 1928 – July 9, 2013)Gray and Veneracion were born on the same day and died one day apart.
It's also meaningful that the day in each case is the 11th... given the inner twin world's propensity for generating "Twin Number" pattern-clusters. They are definitely trying to say something by this... butt what?! We need to examine the evidence.
The 11 can represent the cryptic image of two towers, and because the number 1 shares the same key on my computer keyboard with the exclamation mark "!", then this no doubt factors in to the overall communication. Essentially the number 1 is identical to the capital letter "I", and in fact, the Roman numeral for one uses the letter "I"... with Roman Numeral XI being eleven. In fact 11 can be equated then with II... which I use often in RIIP (a cryptic way of conveying the fact that we are double "I"'s in birth as we are in death). It's also interesting to note that the exclamation mark is nearly identical to an upside down small letter "i"!, and that the letter "I" is also a word, note the etymology:
I (pron.)12c. shortening of Old English ic, first person singular nominative pronoun, from Proto-Germanic *ekan (cf. Old Frisian ik, Old Norse ek, Norwegian eg, Danish jeg, Old High German ih, German ich, Gothic ik), from PIE *eg-, nominative form of the first person singular pronoun (cf. Sanskrit aham, Hittite uk, Latin ego (source of French Je), Greekego, Russian ja, Lithuanian aš). Reduced to i by mid-12c. in northern England, it began to be capitalized mid-13c. to mark it as a distinct word and avoid misreading in handwritten manuscripts.Since "I" is phonetically identical to "eye", this likely factors in, note the following etymology:
eye (n.) c.1200, from Old English ege... from PIE *okw- "to see" (cf. Sanskrit akshi "the eye, the number two...Audd, the Sanskrit version also means "two"... just as we have two eyes, we are two I's.
So then why the singling out of the months July and May?! Of course May is meaningful because it's also my name... butt what of July?! Except that July is also a name... short for "Julius". Since Julius was a man and I'm a woman, it could be that the inner twin world are trying to draw attention to this. Note the etymology http://www.behindthename.com/name/julius:
From a Roman family name which was possibly derived from Greek ιουλος (ioulos) "downy-bearded".Again, beards are generally sported by males... and "downy beards" are generally sported by young adolescent males just coming into puberty.
If you go to the site where I retrieved the etymology of the name Julius, there's also a bust of Julius Caesar... AND notice his audd head, in fact I posted about his audd head once before. The upper left side of Julius' head protrudes outward far more than his right side. So the question is why the difference... well, like different colour eyes tend to bee evidence of tetragametic chimerism, the same is true with Julius' audd shaped head... essentially one side belongs to one twin and the other side belongs to the other. Butt getting back to the "downy beard"... what could the inner twin world bee trying to convey?
The beard covers the chin of males. The most notable difference between the chin of males vs the chin of females from my perspective, is that men tend to have "cleft chins" more than women. In fact, my son developed a cleft chin, butt only as a man... he didn't have one as a teenager... at least it was not very noticeable. This brings me to "natural selection", and I want you now to consider this scenario: During emergence of Tetragametic Chimerism in humans one of the main benefits would have been a "second brain"... certainly the saying holds true "two heads are better than one". This explains our hominid ship to a bigger head-- due to the merging of two brains and nott simply one bigger brain as is the common belief. This would have posed a major problem for the ancient peoples when this mutation first cropped up, given that bigger heads meant harder child birthing... to this day in third world countries, as many as one in three women die from childbirth... that means this mutation is still relatively new. Even with this threat, the "dual" brain offered a better means of survival, butt if people didn't see this at first, only seeing that women were dying in droves because of it, they would have battled against it. They did so by regarding bigger heads as an undesirable trait, and so men and women selected mates accordingly, hence, if you sported a cleft chin, you were virtually unwanted as a mate. Since women don't grow beards a cleft chin would be noticed and she would suffer the consequence of being shunned by potential mates, and since adolescent males acquired a "downy beard" to cover any evidence of a cleft chin emerging, they were immune. This form of "natural selection" process caused the propensity for a cleft chin to remain more hard wired in males vs females. The cleft chin is residual evidence left behind of a merger of laterally conjoined twins (at least with the head).
Note the etymology of "eleven":
eleven (n.) c.1200, elleovene, from Old English endleofan, literally "one left" (over ten), from Proto-Germanic *ainlif- (cf. Old Saxon elleban, Old Frisian andlova, Dutch elf, Old High German einlif, German elf, Old Norse ellifu, Gothic ainlif), a compound of *ain "one" (see one) + PIE *leikw- "leave, remain" (cf. Greek leipein "to leave behind;" see relinquish).The number 11 consists of two "one's" and so note the etymology:
one (n.) from Proto-Germanic *ainaz (cf. Old Norse einn, Danish een, Old Frisian an, Dutch een, German ein, Gothic ains), from PIE *oi-no- "one, unique" (cf. Greek oinos "ace (on dice)...There's something else that I believe is worthwhile investigating-- the meaning of their surnames: Gray, Garment, Veneracion, Monteith.
Originally pronounced as it still is in only, and in dialectal good 'un, young 'un, etc.
Garment and Gray are already recognizable as words... and put together, you get "gray garment", and note how Veneracion sounds like "veneration":
veneration (n.) early 15c., from Middle French veneration, from Latin venerationem (nominative veneratio) "reverence," from past participle stem of venerari "to worship, revere," from venus (genitive veneris) "beauty, love, desire" (see Venus)
Venus Old English, from Latin Venus (plural veneres), in ancient Roman mythology, the goddess of beauty and love... from PIE root *wen- "to strive after, wish, desire, be satisfied" (cf. Sanskrit vanas- "desire," vanati "desires, loves, wins;" Avestan vanaiti "he wishes, is victorious;" Old English wynn "joy," wunian "to dwell," wenian "to accustom, train, wean," wyscan "to wish").It's interesting the above re Venus being also meaning "dwell" ... I guess this explains the word "venue", note the etymology:
venue (n.)early 14c., "a coming for the purpose of attack," from Old French venue "coming," from fem. past participle of venir "to come," from Latin venire "to come," from PIE root *gwa- "to go, come" ...So we now have something more to the tune of "gray garment dwelling"... butt what of Monteith?!
Note the various etymology of the surname Monteith, the first re http://surnames.behindthename.com/names/search.php?nmd=n&terms=monteith:
The name Monteith was not found. Names that sound similar to MONTEITH:The second site re http://surnames.behindthename.com/name/monti:Means "fleece selector" from the Old Italian emendatore. Their job would have been to choose the best fleeces to be made into wool.
MONDADORI Italian
Monti: Means "mountain, hill" in Italian.Well it does jive when you consider that fleece/wool is used to make garments. I think the garment that the inner twin world are referring to is the "dwelling"... it is after all, a garment. What also comes to mind is the "golden fleece"... the ideal garment.
garment (n.) c.1400, variant of garnement (early 14c.), from Old French garnement "garment, attire, clothes," from garnir "fit out, provide, adorn" (see garnish).
garnish (v.) late 14c., from Old French garniss-, present participle stem of garnir "provide, furnish; fortify, reinforce," from a Germanic stem related to Proto-Germanic *warnejan "be cautious, guard, provide for"...The Golden Fleece is symbolic for the ideal garment... for the ideal dwelling, butt what we have at present, is a "gray" garment... this is nott good... we all know that the word "gray" is used to symbolize bleak. We need to aim for gold... for the TUSSH-- the Two United Structure System Home!!
No comments:
Post a Comment