Panic

Continuing on from my previous post, note this excerpt:

Pancic being another addition to the “Remove a Letter Makes a Word” pattern-cluster... as in remove the first “c” makes “panic”; and then we also have a cryptic phrase re “see sea Borg”.  Note from their wiki page

• Josif Pančić (April 17, 1814 – February 25, 1888) panic
• Glenn Theodore Seaborg (April 19, 1912 – February 25, 1999) 

And NOW things get dicey!!  April 17 is my son in laws birthday...

And there’s more to the surname, Pancic, than the word “panic” given that the significance of the removed letter “c” , that gives us: “c panic” ... a cryptic “c/see/sea... panic”.   As with much of the inner twin worlds communication we can take this both literally and figuratively (my surname being Ocean... and that the frank/truth in this blog once realized, will bring about “panic” in some.  This is perhaps why the inner twin world has  held back this blog from the general public and privy to a few... no doubt certain “powers that be” who are secretly helping to pave the way ie: I’ve noticed that as I brought forward information provided by the inner twin world concerning events of the last glacial period—  that the edges of the North American and Eurasian Plates had in fact “uplifted”,  “bowling upward” as the the plate bowed downward the the information on  a Wikipedia page is added in support... note for instance this excerpt from Wikipedia’s “Post Glacial Rebound” page:

Glacial isostatic adjustment also plays an important role in understanding recent global warming and climate change 

Before the eighteenth century, it was thought, in Sweden, that sea levels were falling. On the initiative of Anders Celsius a number of marks were made in rock on different locations along the Swedish coast. In 1765 it was possible to conclude that it was not a lowering of sea levels but an uneven rise of land 

At the bottom of this post, I’ve included an excerpt from the “Post Glacial Rebound” article that now mentions that the North American and Eurasian Plates are not only in the process of  “rebounding” as a result of  the sheer weight of glacial ice that accumulated during the the Last Glacial Maximum, butt that some areas of these plates (they aren’t specific) are presently in the process of  “downward” movement!!  And now note the following information on Anders Celsius:

•  Anders Celsius (27 November 1701 – 25 April 1744) 

You may recall the “25th Day” pattern-cluster found in my last 3 posts... and in fact, the focus on “April 25th” in the first of these, Aretha Franklin and the Rabbit Hole, note the following excerpts from the post:

Their birthdays generate a “March 25, __, May 25, June 25/ 25th Day, Month Sequence” pattern-cluster.

  I explained that from my perspective, the cluster is not coincidence and that the gap representing April 25 is a prompt for us to investigate the date

This tells me that we’re on the “wright” pat!!  

Note the following excerpts from the Post Glacial Rebound Wikipedia page:  

1.  The enormous weight of this ice caused the surface of the Earth's crust to deform and warp downward, forcing the viscoelastic mantle material to flow away from the loaded region. At the end of each glacial period when the glaciers retreated, the removal of this weight led to slow (and still ongoing) uplift or rebound of the land and the return flow of mantle material back under the deglaciatedarea. 
2. Recently, the term "post-glacial rebound" is gradually being replaced by the term "glacial isostatic adjustment". This is in recognition that the response of the Earth to glacial loading and unloading is not limited to the upward rebound movement, but also involves downward land movement, horizontal crustal motion,^[3][4] changes in global sea levels^[5] and the Earth's gravity field,^[6] induced earthquakes,^[7] and changes in the Earth's rotation.^[8] Another alternate term is "glacial isostasy", because the uplift near the centre of rebound is due to the tendency towards the restoration of isostatic equilibrium (as in the case of isostasy of mountains). Unfortunately, that term gives the wrong impression that isostatic equilibrium is somehow reached, so by appending "adjustment" at the end, the motion of restoration is emphasized.

Note, the first excerpt is found near the beginning of the article and the second is found much further down the page.  The second portion was not there years ago when I began making my assertions on the fact.   My take on the fact that the two events aren’t mentioned “together” in the same sentence/paragraph, is that it causes many  to be misled— they don’t consider the “falling” of land on the outer peripheries of the affected plates... or lands near the equator that are also in the process of “falling” as the mantle adjusts here as well.