With a few changes to the email in my previous post, I then emailed mostly everybody on the Coast Magazine where Bruce Wark works... and to the Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime re victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca; CTV News:
The Coast, produced a series of articles written by Bruce Wark that provides damaging false information in regards to my court case, the crux of which involves a sequence of abuse by powerful people in various organizations.
A particularly hard thing for me is how Bruce Wark, journalist for the Coast, who I believed would provide a fair voice, went on to incorporate false damaging statements in his articles. For example, take into consideration this excerpt from the last article in the series where Wark is addressing a claim I made on the stand:
- Ocean testified that after she pulled out of the store parking lot, she caught a split-second glimpse of a grey car barrelling toward her in the northbound lane. She said she stepped on the accelerator to shoot across the road only to see Sullivan’s headlights bearing down on her. Ocean did not mention the grey car when the Coast interviewed her for its cover story on her insurance fight in 2009. But during the trial, she argued that Sullivan may have been racing the grey vehicle and that would explain why he couldn’t get back into his own lane to avoid the accident.
Mr. Wark’s statement is false and damning to me. First, it leads readers to presume that I make things up as I go along. In fact, for the cover story, and at his request, I gave him the court documents that enabled him to get up to speed, AND that would have made him more than aware of the “grey car”. As well, Mr. Wark failed to mention that the person I spoke with at the scene of the accident testified that when I saw the car that struck mine (as the fire truck lights shone on it), I had expressed how odd— that it was a small red car (Mr. Sullivan’s)... and that it was nothing like the impression I had of the car I first saw speeding toward me— a large grey car, and leading me to consider that there were two cars racing with the small red car being out of my line of vision at the time I saw the first (after which I took my eye off the car and put my eyes on the path that I then gunned my car— away from the oncoming vehicle and into my own lane (which I did manage, after which I looked to the road ahead ... and to headlights coming at me in my lane... it didn’t seem right even then that this was the same car). And nor did Mr. Wark mention that I was able to prove that the driver of the other vehicle (Raymond Sullivan) was lying in regards to the first person who came to his vehicle and aid— he said it was a woman he knew, but according to that woman (she did not want to testify, but I subpoenaed her) there was a mutual friend named Johnathan who was at the scene and by Sullivan’s side before she arrived. Johnathan was on my list of those I had a subpoenae for, and he was the only person who conveniently “disappeared”. It could be that he was the driver of the grey car, or that he was a witness and didn’t want to perjure himself while protecting his friend.
I was self represented, with the main thrust of my case being to bring to light conglomerate bullying activity that prevented my case from being heard “fairly” in regards to a car accident in 2000. The abuse is extensive— a network of predators designed to prey herd victims , and it extends to ie : my insurance policy/vehicle insurance company, my previous lawyer, legal firms, judges (including the Judge preceding over my case— ACJ Smith), Minister of Vehicle Insurance (at the time whose previous job Insurance Broker), and Bruce Wark (Journalist with the Coast).
At the end, I was forced to give up my battle— the judge refusing to allow me to continue without putting a $10,000 deposit!? She did so knowing that I was essentially broke after years of battling in court ... that caused me to neglect my business that I started from scratch (and at the time had 25 employees). I had been railroaded. I ended further legal/court proceedings after that. Keep in mind two things: I had won a precedent setting case to the Appeal court, overturning the Judge’s order for me to undergo evaluation by a “forensic” psychiatrist (in other words one who works with the courts), and second, that even though I had won the appeal, I was thrown back into the court room with the same judge!?
Regardless. WHO is out there investigating this major injustice that lay in wait to unsuspecting Canadians?! Who is looking Into the law firms that do pro bono work for car accident victims in a system that enables those with money (like insurance companies) to drag things out forever in court hence encouraging these legal firms to be “bought” and in turn do the expected “arm twisting” to their clients, knuckling them under to accept what the insurer dictates?! When I wouldn’t accept what my lawyer, Barry Mason presented to me, he quit representing me, leaving me as a self represented party in a wake of destruction — such as the lies he made on my behalf to the court (that did not require my signature)?!
Is it too much for me to hope that maybe things have changed in our world with the “Me Too” movement... and other pressures, that someone will finally hear the truth and pave the way for the truth... for me too?
No comments:
Post a Comment