My letter to the Appeal Court in regards to my Appeal:           

C.A. 415635

October 30, 2013

The Honourable Justice Presiding re (Chambers

Hearing October 31, 2013 at 10:30),

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal

Halifax, Nova Scotia

To the Honourable Justice presiding,

Pertaining to this Appeal which to date includes Chambers Hearing dated August 1, 2013 (Justice Bryson presiding), Chambers Hearing dated October 10, 2013 (Justice Fichaud Presiding), I wish to add to my my submissions and in particular my October 8, 2013 letter addressed to Justice Bryson, which was then sent to Justice Fichaud as he was the new Judge assigned.

In my October 8, 2013 written submission, I explained the seriousness of my great dilemma and as well, I gave the evidence in support of this. If I were to breakdown the issues that my Appeal addresses and choose to make an amendment to address only one main issue--pertaining to the bias of Associate Chief Justice Deborah K. Smith, a bias that is solely based on her past work experience in affiliation with those working within the Insurance Industry (whom she has profited from as I'm sure many have either directly or indirectly), than no transcripts are necessary, only the evidence-- new evidence coming forward.

I site for example, Justice Hugo Lafayette Black who was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Justice Black served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States up to 1971, and he was also anti Catholic and a Klu Klux Klan member (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_L._Black). Even though Justice Black had resigned from the KKK, it still remains that given his background, it would be unethical and wholly against the Civil Rights and Freedoms of a Democracy such as the United States to expect that a person of colour and/or a Catholic to feel 'safe' in coming before this judge, and if such a person were to bring forward the evidence that clearly indicates Justice Black's bias, then he should be allowed to do so without transcripts and based wholly on the evidence.

I am in a similar position as the above theoretical Person of Colour/Catholic coming before Justice Black. My present situation involving injustices within the legal/judicial/insurance system have essentially the same effect. Evidence exists revealing that many law firms, including firms representing persons such as “motor vehicle accident victims”, are reliant on a 'good rapport' with Insurers. If a lawyer/law firm bucks the system which favours the insurer, the firm can be made to pay. As an example: Insurance companies can apply their extensive wealth to manipulate the system in such a way that it takes years (my vehicle accident occurred 13 years ago!!) to get through the system... hence forcing the hand of the motor vehicle accident victims who often end up settling for much less than what they deserve or in cases such as mine, end up with nothing ... except 'maybe' the small bit of safety offered from being within the Court system and so under the public eye... which I no longer have confidence in.

I have considered to amend my Appeal so that it reflects the above-- simply base my Appeal on new evidence, but I am simply too afraid to do so. I personally can't see a way forward while being held under this gun. I can only express myself and that is all... that is all that I've been doing for 13 years.

With having said the above, part of this “gun” involves what I refer to as the inner twin world. As I explained earlier, evidence via the Genetic findings of Tetragametic Chimera Humans and the evidence as found on my blog, occurred near simultaneously for the simple reason being that they had planned it this way. Evidence exists to prove that the motor vehicle accident of 2000 that Mr. Sullivan and I were involved in was not an accident but was perpetrated by our inner twin working in collaboration together and with the inner twin world. I have since come to realize (from the evidence-- the inner twin world communication), that there is far more than what meets the eye in our world. It is evident to me now that if the inner twin world wants to come out in full force they could easily do so. It is evident then that they choose not to. In the same breath if they wanted to, they could easily bring to the public attention the injustices within the system that I speak of , but again, they choose not to. I have to give this consideration, because if they don't me to go forward with the evidence, then who am I to argue... I fear my inner twin and the inner twin world more than anyone else.

This is why I cannot move forward in regards to my case and my Appeal, at least at not this point in time. I reiterate, because of the evidence (inner twin communication) as my blog reveals, it is not safe for me to proceed with my Appeal (and therefore my case) at this time. For the same reason, I will not be attending the hearing set for October 31, 2013 at 10 a.m.

A copy of this is emailed to Ms. Mitchell counsel for Economical Insurance. Mr. Sullivan does not have an email and so for this reason he has not received a copy. I would like to mention at this time, that Mr. Sullivan (self represented defendant) has acted in a threatening manner toward my partner, while we attempted to serve him with court stamped documents. My partner who has faithful attended the great majority of Court Hearings up until the said event with Mr. Sullivan, refuses to be present any longer in regards to this endeavour where even my loved ones are intimidated for having dared to support me.

May Ocean

Appellant/Self Represented Party