Friday, July 19, 2013

Affidavit Following Notice of Appeal (Rendition)

C.A. No 415635



NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL


BETWEEN:

May Ocean Plaintiff
- and –

Economical Mutual Insurance Company of Canada
And Raymond Patrick Sullivan Defendants


AFFIDAVIT

I May Ocean of Halifax Co, Nova Scotia, hereby make oath and say as follows:

  1. THAT I am the Appellant/ Self Representative in this proceeding, and have personal knowledge of the matters involved except where I specifically state as based upon information and belief.

  1. THAT I state, in this affidavit, the source of any information that is not based on my own personal knowledge, and I state my belief of the source.

  1. THAT I am unable to comply with the Civil Procedure Rule which states:

90.26 (1) Except as provided in Rule 90.26(4), an appellant must file a certificate of readiness in Form 90.26 in support of the motion for directions no less than four days before the day the motion is to be heard.

  1. THAT this Affidavit is filed in accordance Civil Procedure Rule 90.26 (4):
90.26 (4) An appellant who is unable to comply with Rule 90.26 (1) must file an affidavit in support of the motion for directions, explaining the omission.

  1. THAT this Affidavit is provided in lieu of the certificate of readiness in support of the motion for directions.

  1. THAT I am able to comply with and certify to the Court, the following sections of Civil Procedure Rule 90.26 (2) :
(a) the court appealed from has issued a formal order
(b) the appellant has paper copies of the written decisions under appeal.
(g) the appellant has sent a copy of the notice of appeal to the judge, from whose decision the appeal is taken

  1. That I am unable to comply with or certify to Court, the following sections of Civil Procedure Rule 90.26 (2):

(c) the appellant has ordered copies of the audio recordings from the

appropriate court;

(d) the appellant has ordered the transcription of the audio recordings from a
certified court reporter;

(e) the appellant has been informed by the certified court reporter that the

transcription will be completed by a specified date;

(f) the appellant will be able to file the appeal book by a specified date;

  1. THAT my reasons for not being able to comply or certify as per #7 above is as follows:

My Notice of Appeal mentions the involvement of a third party in the Motor Accident of 2000 (Herein referred to as the “MVA”) that pertains to my case before the Supreme Court and as per my Notice of Appeal court stamped May 7, 2013. The Associate Chief Justice Deborah K. Smith (Herein referred to as ACJ Smith), refused to allow this third party to come forward in the only way possible-- by way of my Expert Report containing years of valuable Research that are down loaded to my Toumai and Pronoiasecret Blogs.

The research materials reveal a vast and intricate array of what I refer to as “pattern-clusters”, that on first appearance appear to be unusual coincidences, however as more of the patterns emerge and interconnect, it becomes more than apparent that the patterns are a form of communication from a highly intelligent and for the most part, a hidden source.
Understandably, it's with great difficulty that I bring the truth forward in regards to what I refer to as “inner twin's” and the “inner twin world”-- who are the above mentioned third party involved in the MVA. It goes without saying that your first impulse will be to consider me a lunatic, however on examining the evidence it will become clear that this isn't the case. This brings me to another concern – that the reaction from the greater public will not be favourable and could generate panic akin to “witch hunts” of the past.

My inner twin and the inner twin world have made it clear that unless I cooperate, they will retaliate by wrecking havoc in my life and those close to me, as they have done in the past. If I do not bring the proof forward that implicates the inner twin world's involvement in the MVA and revealing to their conspiracy, then they will retaliate, of that I'm certain.

Under these circumstances, it is within my legal and moral right to expect the Appeal Court to examine the evidence pertaining to the threats as issued by my/our inner twins, first and foremost. As a further and under the circumstances, it would an injustice to expect me to deal with various other aspects relating to this appeal while the threats that I speak of looms dangerously overhead. With that said, I believe that it is still within my right to expect the Appeal Court to regard this as an urgent priority, over an above all else pertaining to this case.
Given the precedent set by ACJ Smith and the previous Appeal Judges (as per my earlier Appeal), bifurcation and even trifurcation is “allowed” within the judicial forum. Given this, it is safe for me to assume that my request as per the above is within my rights and that the Appeal Book can be produced and examined in sections, with the first one to deal solely with the most important: “the threat”.
It is within my rights to present my case as I see fit and especially given that this is supported by the Civil Procedure Rule:

  1. These Rules are for the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every proceeding.

I ask that the Appeal Court consider Civil Procedure Rule 1.1 in conjunction with mitigating circumstances, that warrant an immediate examination of the evidence as pertaining to the inner twin's and “the threats” that they have issued. This can easily be done by going to the internet where I have downloaded my research and the evidence on my Blogs. My “Pronoiasecret” blog is the best place to begin, and in particular my January 30, 2013 post via the link immediately below:


Beginning with reading the post as per the above link and continuing to read the posts following, will reveal enough evidence to prove my claims. Since the evidence as put forth in my blogs is derived from the internet, it is essential to read directly from the posts, hence enabling the internet links provided to be accessed in a manner that is supported by Civil Procedure Rule 1.1.

I ask that the Appeal Court consider this excerpt from my Research as a small excerpt/example of the inner twin world's “coming out” and “communication” process, one that involves their generating pattern-clusters in conjunction with generating acts of violence (such as my MVA included). In many cases, what appears to be accidents and acts of terrorism , are in fact generated via inner twins who have the uncanny ability to influence my/our thoughts and actions without our being aware. The following example is what I refer to as the “Top WWI Aces / 111” pattern-cluster:

  • The Red Baron (2 May 1892 – 21 April 1918), German pilot and top ace of World War. The Red Baron died on the 111th day of the year.
  • Billy" Bishop (8 February 1894 - 11 September 1956), top Canadian ace in World War I, died on the day where 111 days remain until the end of the year.
  1. Source References for the above statistics:
The date of 9/11 factoring in with the above, is significant not only because of the pattern-cluster, but because of the 9/11 connection to the 2001 Terrorist strike on the “Twin” Towers of New York City. This is significant.

Recently, and as pertaining my blog post re http://pronoiasecrets.blogspot.ca/2013/07/john-b-hightower-riip-magdalenes-low.html, note the following:

Wikipedia's Deaths in 2013 site added under its July 6th list :
John B. Hightower,
Note this excerpt from John Hightower's wiki page re http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Hightower:
John Brantley Hightower (May 23, 1933 - July 6, 2013)
Note his date of birth information re http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_23:
May 23 is the 143rd day of the year (144th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. There are 222 days remaining until the end of the year.
222 days remain in the year at the last stroke of midnight on May 22nd until the last stroke of midnight on May 23rd!! The “222 Identical Number Sequence” pattern-cluster”, is a particular trade mark signature of the inner twin world, which in conjunction with the surname “Hightower”, is designed to communicate something.
Just prior to the above post, my July 4, 2013 post mentions the Purdy's Wharf “twin” towers here in Halifax. Note the “twin” numbers contained in the statistical information pertaining to Purdy's Wharf re http://www.emporis.com/statistics/tallest-buildings-halifax-canada:


#
Building
City
Images
Floors
Height
Year










2




22
88 m
1985


Note as well, both law firms hired by Economical to battle my legal action are located at Purdy's Wharf, with Stewart McKelvey at Tower I and McInnis Cooper at Tower II. This is not a coincidence, the patterns are too vast and too intricate to be anything else other than a means of “coming out” and Communicating to us in the outer twin world, here and now.


I have included a copy of my latest post to my Pronoiasecret Blog (Attached as Exhibit “A”). This will help to serve as a guide line, however to check the links and references it is more expedient and cost efficient to log onto my blog site where the web site links are imbedded for the sources and references.
Given the time constraints I have not provided all the necessary proof to validate my claims-- the proof that are found in the dates of birth concerning my family members that are concerned ie my son and my grand daughter, I have included a copy of my partner, Cathy Bennett's, passport indicating her date of birth and I have included a copy of my birth certificate that indicates my date of birth (Attached as Exhibit “B”). I believe that it is within the Appeal Courts ability to garner the evidence in regards to the birthdates of all those concerned and including: my son Christopher Michael Spinney; My grandaughter Addisyn Greenlee Spinney; my partner Cathy Elizabeth Bennett and myself, May-Monique Mary Ocean (nee Roop)
I ask that the Appeal Court and/or the Judge of the Appeal Court who is privy to this Affidavit, give due consideration to the “emergency” particulars of my/our situation, all of which pertains to my Court case with the Supreme Court and this Appeal, a situation that constitutes as sufficient grounds for why I am unable to continue with the other aspects involving my Court case and this Appeal as per indicated in my Notice of Appeal, at least not at this time. Simply put my family, among others, are being targeted by our inner twin's and the inner twin world and so, lives depend on this situation being treated as an emergency and as such properly dealt with as per Civil Procedure Rule 1.1 and as per my/our Civil Rights and Freedoms... our legal rights as per below.

Legal rights: rights of people in dealing with the justice system and law enforcement, namely:

Section 7: right to life, liberty, and security of the person.
Section 9: freedom from arbitrary detention or imprisonment
Section 10: right to legal counsel and the guarantee of habeas corpus

Section 12: right not to be subject to cruel and unusual punishment

Section 14: rights to an interpreter in a court proceeding
Equality rights:
section 15: equal treatment before and under the law, and equal protection and benefit of the law without discrimination.

**************



List of Attachments:
  • Exhibit “A” Blog Post dated July 19, 2013
  • Exhibit “B” Passport copy proving Birth date of Cathy Bennett and birth certificate proving Birth date of myself, May Ocean




SWORN TO at Halifax Regional Municipality,

Province of Nova Scotia, this ________ day of

_________________________, 2013



)
)
)
)
______________________________ _____________________________
Commissioner of Oaths Applicant and Self Represented Party
May Ocean



*note, the post I submitted via Exhibit "A" is located at:


No comments:

Post a Comment